<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Poly Charlotteans: One year later</title> <atom:link href="http://goqnotes.com/5402/poly-charlotteans-one-year-later/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://goqnotes.com/5402/poly-charlotteans-one-year-later/</link> <description>Carolina LGBT arts, entertainment, news, views</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 03:45:11 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Anita Wagner</title><link>http://goqnotes.com/5402/poly-charlotteans-one-year-later/comment-page-1/#comment-29830</link> <dc:creator>Anita Wagner</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 17:29:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://goqnotes.com/?p=5402#comment-29830</guid> <description>Chiming in late here, thanks to Matt Comer for pointing me here.As to age/life experience and practicing polyamory successfully, young adults are living poly lives in ever increasing numbers, and they need all the resources and encouragement they can get as they learn how to make it work - as do we all.It doesn&#039;t help at all to have their own local community turn against them, that&#039;s for sure.  Unfortunately that bias is a direct result of Stanley Kurtz&#039;s slippery slope argument.  Kurtz played LGBTs and marriage equality against we polyamorists and did so masterfully.  What a shame that he has been successful to this extreme.Before I opened myself up to my bisexuality and recognized polyamory as a personal option, I lived a het life, married to or otherwise partnered in long-term relationships with several men and was divorced twice.  I came to wish profoundly that our culture emphasized the importance of learning how to communicate and do all the other things well that create healthy relationships.  We don&#039;t learn it in school, even though it is a hugely valuable life skill.So, we all make relationship mistakes, especially when young.  Some of us learn from them.  Over time, in varying amounts depending on level of intentionality and other things, we get to know a lot more about ourselves and what we want.  Hopefully we gain emotional intelligence as well.  This is typically how we get better at our relationships as we get older, whether they are polyamorous or monogamous.But with intentionality the process can be accellerated and relationship skills mastered much more quickly.  In order to live a happy polyamorous life, there is really no substitute for educating ourselves and our partners and doing a lot of talking together.  By the way, the &quot;Designing Your Relationships&quot; section of Tristan Taormino&#039;s book, Opening Up, is a great place to start.None of this is intended specifically as a commentary on Jim, Thomas and Chris&#039;s relationship experiences or anything they may or may not have  done.  I applaud and appreciate their courage and willingness to take the risk and be open about their family and relationship experiences, and wish them joy, love and success in their future relationships.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chiming in late here, thanks to Matt Comer for pointing me here.</p><p>As to age/life experience and practicing polyamory successfully, young adults are living poly lives in ever increasing numbers, and they need all the resources and encouragement they can get as they learn how to make it work &#8211; as do we all.</p><p>It doesn&#8217;t help at all to have their own local community turn against them, that&#8217;s for sure.  Unfortunately that bias is a direct result of Stanley Kurtz&#8217;s slippery slope argument.  Kurtz played LGBTs and marriage equality against we polyamorists and did so masterfully.  What a shame that he has been successful to this extreme.</p><p>Before I opened myself up to my bisexuality and recognized polyamory as a personal option, I lived a het life, married to or otherwise partnered in long-term relationships with several men and was divorced twice.  I came to wish profoundly that our culture emphasized the importance of learning how to communicate and do all the other things well that create healthy relationships.  We don&#8217;t learn it in school, even though it is a hugely valuable life skill.</p><p>So, we all make relationship mistakes, especially when young.  Some of us learn from them.  Over time, in varying amounts depending on level of intentionality and other things, we get to know a lot more about ourselves and what we want.  Hopefully we gain emotional intelligence as well.  This is typically how we get better at our relationships as we get older, whether they are polyamorous or monogamous.</p><p>But with intentionality the process can be accellerated and relationship skills mastered much more quickly.  In order to live a happy polyamorous life, there is really no substitute for educating ourselves and our partners and doing a lot of talking together.  By the way, the &#8220;Designing Your Relationships&#8221; section of Tristan Taormino&#8217;s book, Opening Up, is a great place to start.</p><p>None of this is intended specifically as a commentary on Jim, Thomas and Chris&#8217;s relationship experiences or anything they may or may not have  done.  I applaud and appreciate their courage and willingness to take the risk and be open about their family and relationship experiences, and wish them joy, love and success in their future relationships.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Robert</title><link>http://goqnotes.com/5402/poly-charlotteans-one-year-later/comment-page-1/#comment-25721</link> <dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 17:17:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://goqnotes.com/?p=5402#comment-25721</guid> <description>I really don&#039;t think there&#039;s anything about polyamorous relationships that would make them automatically less successful than monogamous ones.These boys were all in their low 20s...most relationships among folks that age don&#039;t last long at all.  It had nothing to do with polyamory.I hope someday Q-notes does another story about polyamory...but this time, use mature responsible experienced---and successful--adults as the example.  (Instead of using it as just an excuse to show four shirtless twinks on the cover, as you did last time.)   I definitely think it would be a more realistic portrayal.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s anything about polyamorous relationships that would make them automatically less successful than monogamous ones.</p><p>These boys were all in their low 20s&#8230;most relationships among folks that age don&#8217;t last long at all.  It had nothing to do with polyamory.</p><p>I hope someday Q-notes does another story about polyamory&#8230;but this time, use mature responsible experienced&#8212;and successful&#8211;adults as the example.  (Instead of using it as just an excuse to show four shirtless twinks on the cover, as you did last time.)   I definitely think it would be a more realistic portrayal.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 3/13 queries in 0.025 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: goqnotes.com @ 2012-02-11 03:16:49 -->
